Archive

July 8, 2025

Browsing

The past week has been relatively stable in terms of sector rankings, with no new entrants or exits from the top five. However, we’re seeing some interesting shifts within the rankings that warrant closer examination. Let’s dive into the details and see what the Relative Rotation Graphs (RRGs) are telling us about the current market dynamics.

Sector Rankings Shuffle

The top three sectors, technology, industrials, and communication services, remain firmly entrenched in their positions. But the real action is happening just below them. Financials climbed to the number four spot, consequently pushing utilities down to fifth place. This shift is significant, as it indicates a move towards more cyclical sectors in the top rankings.

These changes suggest a potential shift towards more economically sensitive and offensive sectors, which supports a bullish scenario or at least a move away from defensive positioning.

  1. (1) Technology – (XLK)
  2. (2) Industrials – (XLI)
  3. (3) Communication Services – (XLC)
  4. (5) Financials – (XLF)*
  5. (4) Utilities – (XLU)*
  6. (8) Materials – (XLB)*
  7. (7) Consumer Staples – (XLP)
  8. (6) Real-Estate – (XLRE)*
  9. (10) Consumer Discretionary – (XLY)*
  10. (9) Energy – (XLE)*
  11. (11) Healthcare – (XLV)

Weekly RRG

The weekly Relative Rotation Graph continues to show strength in the technology sector within the leading quadrant. Industrials is also maintaining its position in the leading quadrant, with a very short tail, indicating a consistent relative uptrend.

Communication services, financials, and utilities are currently in the weakening quadrant. However, communication services have rebounded and appear to be making their way back towards the leading quadrant again.

Financials and utilities, on the other hand, are showing negative headings, with utilities displaying the weakest momentum (longest tail).

Daily RRG

Switching to the daily RRG, we get a more granular view of recent sector movements:

  • Technology remains the strongest sector, with a high RS ratio and a short tail
  • Communication services are rotating at a slightly negative heading but still within the leading quadrant
  • Financials and industrials are showing promise in the improving quadrant
  • Utilities continues to rotate within the lagging quadrant, confirming its weakness

The positioning of these sectors, particularly the strength of technology and improvements in financials and industrials, suggests a shift towards more cyclical and less defensive sectors in the market.

Technology

Tech continues its rally after breaking above the $240 resistance area. The raw RS line is also climbing, having broken out of its falling channel. This sector remains the market leader and shows no signs of slowing down.

Industrials

The industrial sector has cleared its overhead resistance and is pushing higher. Its RS line is putting in new highs, reflecting strong relative performance. The RRG lines remain in the leading quadrant and may be turning up again, a bullish sign.

Communication Services

Comms have broken above their resistance around 105. While still at the lower boundary of its rising RS channel, it’s starting to pick up steam. Both RRG lines are climbing, with RS momentum approaching the 100 level. A cross above that level would put it back in the leading quadrant.

Financials

Financials broke through overhead resistance last week, which is a significant positive development. It’s now above both horizontal resistance and its former support line. The relative strength line needs some work, but with the current price breakout, improvement seems likely in the near future.

Utilities

The weak link in the top five, utilities, remains range-bound. It’s still above support, but not by much. With the broader market rising, utilities’ sideways movement is causing its RS line to drop. The RRG lines are rolling over, and we may soon see this sector rotate into the lagging quadrant on the weekly RRG.

Portfolio Performance Update

I must admit, our portfolio is still underperforming. The current drawdown is a little over 8%, which isn’t ideal. However, this is the nature of trend-following strategies. We’re sticking with our approach through this period of underperformance, confident that historical results support our patience.

If market trends continue as they are, we should see more offensive sectors rotate into the top five. This shift, in turn, should help us overcome the current drawdown and eventually bring us ahead of the S&P again.

Remember, investing is a marathon, not a sprint. Periods of underperformance are normal and to be expected. The key is to stay disciplined and trust in your strategy.

#StayAlert and have a great week. –Julius


US President Donald Trump’s massive One Big Beautiful Bill is poised to reshape America’s entire industrial and energy future, dramatically reorienting policies and incentives for various industries.

Passed by the Senate by a 51 to 50 margin, with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie, the legislation now heads to conference negotiations that will finalize its far-reaching impacts on energy investment, critical minerals and the digital economy.

Framed by the White House as a blueprint for restoring American industrial strength, the bill combines major fossil fuel incentives, nuclear supports, and deep tax cuts with steep rollbacks of renewable energy subsidies and critical minerals credits.

Here are some of the bill’s most significant provisions.

Mining incentives on the chopping block

Perhaps the most consequential piece of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” for the mining industry is its planned phaseout of the Section 45X advanced manufacturing production credit.

This 10 percent tax incentive was created under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act to encourage domestic extraction, processing and recycling of critical minerals — such as lithium, nickel, cobalt and rare earth elements — that power batteries and other industrial technologies.

Under the new bill, the 45X credit would begin to wind down in 2031 and be eliminated entirely by 2034.

That reversal has drawn fierce criticism from mining advocates, who warn that scaling back the credit undermines efforts to build a resilient domestic supply chain.

Meanwhile, the National Mining Association, which has long called for expanded mining incentives, expressed their support for the bill’s passage and praised other funding provisions in the bill that support the industry.

“We urge the House to quickly pass this bill,” said Rich Nolan, National Mining Association president and CEO, in a statement after the Senate vote. “It increases the competitiveness of the American mining industry and provides vital incentives, including funding to counter China’s mineral dominance.”

The overall direction of the bill, though, makes clear that domestic producers will face a more challenging environment after a brief window of continued support up until 2034.

The bill’s tougher guardrails on critical mineral sourcing add to this challenge. Alongside the phaseout of 45X, lawmakers included new restrictions to curb reliance on “prohibited foreign entities” — primarily adversarial nations like China and Russia — in the supply chain.

Under the legislation, companies seeking the advanced manufacturing credit will have to pass a ‘material assistance cost ratio test’ to prove they are not overly dependent on inputs or components from these foreign entities.

Fossil fuels win big

The legislation delivers a sweeping victory to oil, gas and coal interests.

First, it mandates an ambitious leasing program for fossil fuel production, opening 30 lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico over 15 years and more than 30 lease sales annually on federal lands across nine states. It also cuts the royalties oil and gas producers pay to the government, aiming to encourage higher output.

“This bill will be the most transformational legislation that we’ve seen in decades in terms of access to both federal lands and federal waters,” Mike Sommers, president of the American Petroleum Institute, told CNBC.

“It includes almost all of our priorities.”

Coal producers, too, receive a major boost. The bill designates at least 4 million additional acres of federal land for coal mining and slashes the royalties paid by coal companies.

In a further sweetener for metallurgical coal producers, the bill permits them to use advanced manufacturing tax credits to support coal used in steelmaking.

In a controversial move, the bill also extends a carbon capture tax credit designed to trap carbon emissions from industrial facilities. However, under the new language, oil companies can claim a higher tax benefit for using captured CO2 to push more oil out of aging wells.

Hydrogen fuel investments get a partial reprieve: the hydrogen production tax credit will now end in 2028 instead of immediately, giving oil majors more time to roll out projects.

Renewables face deep cuts

In stark contrast to fossil fuels, renewable energy incentives are headed for a steep rollback. The legislation phases out the investment and production tax credits that have supported wind and solar since the 1990s.

Under the new plan, renewable power projects placed into service after 2027 will no longer qualify for these credits, although a one year grace period will apply to projects that begin construction within 12 months of the bill becoming law.

A related tax credit encouraging the use of US-made components in renewable installations will also expire for projects entering service after 2027. Projects that start construction in the year after the bill becomes law can still qualify, but anything beyond that window loses access to the incentive.

The bill also adopts Senate language providing a more gradual phaseout for these credits, rather than the abrupt cutoff proposed by the House.

Still, the overall impact is clear: after decades of public policy designed to grow wind and solar, their incentives are being dismantled.

President Trump’s views on renewables are no secret. In a June 29 Fox News interview, he criticized solar farms and wind turbines as “ugly as hell” and vowed to restore fossil fuels to the heart of US energy policy.

Crypto gets an indirect boost

Cryptocurrency investors have found reason for optimism in the bill, even though no direct amendments on crypto taxes made it into the final text.

As the bill moves forward, it extends the 2017 Trump-era tax cuts, adds new tax-free treatment for up to US$25,000 in tips and US$12,500 in overtime pay, and expands estate tax exemptions.

These changes are projected to raise the US national debt by between US$3.3 trillion and US$5 trillion over the next decade. That debt expansion, paired with more disposable income from tax cuts, has created a bullish narrative for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as a hedge against inflation.

“More debt can lead to more money printing. That’s good for BTC in the long run,” crypto analyst Ranjay Singh said in an X post.

Crypto market observers had hoped the bill would fix rules around staking, airdrops and Bitcoin-mining taxation, but those amendments fell short in the Senate. Senator Cynthia Lummis, for instance, tried to remove what she called a “double tax” on Bitcoin miners, but the proposal was left out of the final package.

Even so, crypto advocates believe the combination of looser monetary policy, expanded government spending and higher debt will create an environment that supports digital assets.

Artificial intelligence remains a state issue

One of the most hard-fought technology debates in the bill revolved around artificial intelligence (AI) regulation.

The House version of the bill had sought to impose a 10 year nationwide moratorium preventing states from enacting their own AI laws. Senate Republicans, led by Senators Marsha Blackburn and Ted Cruz, negotiated that down to five years before ultimately scrapping the idea altogether.

The final bill does not block states from regulating AI — a major development for privacy, civil rights and consumer groups.

“The Senate did the right thing today for kids, for families and for our future by voting to strip out the dangerous 10-year ban on state AI laws,” Jim Steyer, CEO of Common Sense Media, said in a statement.

The removal of the moratorium means the US will remain a patchwork of state-level rules, from deepfake bans in California to mental health chatbot restrictions in Utah.

Industry leaders have previously complained that this environment creates compliance headaches and could hamper innovation.

“There’s growing recognition that the current patchwork approach to regulating AI isn’t working,” said Chris Lehane, chief global affairs officer at OpenAI. “But until there is a national framework, this is what we’ll have.”

Securities Disclosure: I, Giann Liguid, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

This post appeared first on investingnews.com

Former White House physician Kevin O’Connor, who served as doctor to former President Joe Biden, requested a delay to his upcoming testimony before the House Oversight Committee this week.

O’Connor was scheduled to testify on Wednesday, but is now in a disagreement with the committee over the scope of the questions he will be expected to answer during his testimony. The committee, led by Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., is interviewing the doctor as part of its investigation into Biden’s mental fitness and his administration’s use of an autopen.

A lawyer for O’Connor requested the testimony be delayed to July 28 or August 4 in a letter to Comer.

‘Dr. O’Connor has legal and ethical obligations that he must satisfy and for which violations carry serious consequences to him professionally and personally,’ the letter says.

‘We are unaware of any prior occasion on which a Congressional Committee has subpoenaed a physician to testify about the treatment of an individual patient.  And the notion that a Congressional Committee would do so without any regard whatsoever for the confidentiality of the physician-patient relationship is alarming.’

A spokesman for the Oversight Committee replied in a statement that O’Connor and his legal team were merely trying to ‘stonewall’ the process. The committee is planning to move forward with Wednesday’s testimony, which O’Connor faces a subpoena to attend.

The committee said O’Connor is welcome to object to individual questions during his testimony. But O’Connor is not allowed, in the committee’s view, to delay or decline a congressional subpoena due to concerns over questions about potentially privileged information.

The debate over O’Connor’s testimony comes weeks after a former top aide to Biden, Neera Tanden, told the Oversight Committee that she was authorized to direct autopen signatures but was unaware of who in the president’s inner circle was giving her final clearance.

During Tanden’s interview before Congress last month, which lasted more than five hours, she told lawmakers that, in her role as staff secretary and senior advisor to the former president between 2021 and 2023, she was authorized to direct autopen signatures on behalf of Biden, an Oversight Committee official told Fox News.

‘Ms. Tanden testified that she had minimal interaction with President Biden, despite wielding tremendous authority,’ Comer said at the time. ‘She explained that to obtain approval for autopen signatures, she would send decision memos to members of the President’s inner circle and had no visibility of what occurred between sending the memo and receiving it back with approval. Her testimony raises serious questions about who was really calling the shots in the Biden White House amid the President’s obvious decline. We will continue to pursue the truth for the American people.’

Fox News’ Kelly Phares and Madeleine Rivera and the Associated Press contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS